A direct comparison in diagnostic performance of CDUS, FDG-PET/CT and MRI in patients suspected of giant cell arteritis

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study directly compares the diagnostic performance of colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS), fluor-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients suspected of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods Patients with suspected GCA were included in a nested-case control pilot study. CDUS, whole body FDG-PET/CT and cranial MRI were performed within 5 working days after initial clinical evaluation. Clinical diagnosis after six months follow-up by experienced rheumatologists in the field of GCA, blinded for imaging, was used as reference standard. Diagnostic performance of the imaging modalities was determined. Stratification for GCA subtype was performed and imaging results were evaluated in different risk stratification groups. Results In total, 23 patients with GCA and 19 patients suspected of but not diagnosed with GCA were included. Sensitivity was 69.6% (95%CI 50.4%–88.8%) for CDUS, 52.2% (95%CI 31.4%–73.0%) for FDG-PET/CT and 56.5% (95%CI 35.8%–77.2%) for MRI. Specificity was 100% for CDUS, FDG-PET/CT and MRI. FDG-PET/CT was negative for GCA in all isolated cranial GCA patients (n = 8), while MRI was negative in all isolated extracranial GCA patients (n = 4). In four GCA patients with false-negative (n = 2; intermediate and high risk) or inconclusive (n = 2; low and intermediate risk) CDUS results, further imaging confirmed diagnosis. Conclusions Sensitivity of CDUS was highest, while specificity was excellent in all imaging modalities. Nevertheless, confidence intervals of all imaging modalities were overlapping. Following EULAR recommendations, CDUS can be used as a first test to diagnose GCA. With insufficient evidence for GCA, further testing considering GCA subtype is warranted.