Affiliation:
1. Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases , Seoul, Republic of Korea
2. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Korea Ltd , Seoul, Korea
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in Korean patients with RA.
Methods
The study used data from a single academic referral hospital’s registries of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the DAS28-ESR after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results
This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFis) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% CI 0.720–2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and bDMARDs, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFis (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033–3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events but similar rates of serious adverse events to TNFis.
Conclusion
In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events compared with TNFis, while the occurrence of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02602704.
Funder
Pfizer Inc
Ministry of Health & Welfare
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)