Potential impact of European Medicines Agency measures to minimize risk of serious side effects on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK

Author:

Tian Zixing1ORCID,Kearsley-Fleet Lianne1,Galloway James2ORCID,Watson Kath1, ,Lunt Mark1,Hyrich Kimme L13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester, UK

2. Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London , London, UK

3. National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, due to safety concerns, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published risk-minimization measures limiting JAKi prescription to certain at-risk patients unless no suitable alternative is available. This analysis included patients who had started their first-ever JAKi (before EMA measures were published) in a large national cohort study to investigate the potential impact of these measures on JAKi prescribing and utilization in the UK. Method RA patients starting first-ever JAKi therapy in BSRBR-RA between 13 February 2017 and 31 May 2022 were included. The percentages of patients meeting the EMA risk criteria were presented. For the at-risk patients, their previous numbers of distinct biologic (b) DMARD classes prescribed were described. Result A total of 1341 patients were included, and 80% (N = 1075) met ≥1 EMA risk criterion. Of those who met ≥1 risk criterion, 529 patients (49%) had received JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD class, whereas 299 (28%) had received ≥3 prior bDMARD classes. Conclusion Four-fifths of RA patients who had commenced a JAKi before the EMA advisory were considered ‘at-risk’, with prescribing only advised if there was no suitable alternative. Almost a third of those patients had already received ≥3 bDMARDs classes, and alternative therapies would be very limited for them; however, suitable alternatives might have existed for the remaining proportion, especially for those who received a JAKi as their first or second b/tsDMARD, and re-evaluation of the suitability of their treatment may be needed.

Funder

British Society for Rheumatolog

National Institute for Health and Care Research

NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3