Medication decision-making and adherence in lupus: patient–physician discordance and the impact of previous ‘adverse medical experiences’

Author:

Sloan Melanie1,Lever Elliott2,Gordon Caroline3,Harwood Rupert4,Georgopoulou Sofia5,Naughton Felix6ORCID,Wincup Chris7ORCID,Sutton Stephen1,D’Cruz David8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

2. Rheumatology Department, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow

3. Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

4. Patient and Public Involvement in Lupus Research Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

5. Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London

6. Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich

7. Department of Rheumatology, University College London

8. The Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Medication adherence is critical in the successful management of lupus. There is very limited existing literature on reasons why non-adherence is not reported. This study explores the impact of current and previous medical experiences on patient satisfaction, adherence and reporting of non-adherence. Methods Mixed methodology involved thematic analysis of in-depth interviews (n = 23) to further explore the statistically analysed quantitative survey findings (n = 186). Results This study identified five themes: (i) physician-patient discordance and a ‘hierarchy of evidence’ in medication decisions; (ii) the association of adherence with satisfaction with care; (iii) the persisting impact of past adverse medical experiences (AMEs); (iv) the dynamic balance of patient-physician control; and (v) holistic care, beyond a purely medication-based focus. Improving quality of life (43% of participants) and a supportive medical relationship (24%) were the main reasons for adherence. Patient-priorities and self-reported symptoms were perceived as less important to physicians than organ-protection and blood results. Non-reporters of non-adherence, non-adherers and those with past AMEs (e.g. psychosomatic misdiagnoses) had statistically significant lower satisfaction with care. The importance of listening to patients was a key component of every theme, and associated with patient satisfaction and adherence. The mean rating for rheumatologist’s listening skills was 2.88 for non-adherers compared with 3.53 for other participants (mean difference 0.65, P = 0.003). Conclusion Patients would like more weight and discussion given to self-reported symptoms and quality of life in medication decisions. Greater understanding and interventions are required to alleviate the persisting impact of past AMEs on some patients’ wellbeing, behaviour and current medical relationships.

Funder

LUPUS UK

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

Reference42 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3