Psychometric properties of outcome measurement instruments for ANCA-associated vasculitis: a systematic literature review

Author:

Berti Alvise1ORCID,Boleto Gonçalo2,Merkel Peter A3,Tómasson Gunnar4,Monti Sara5ORCID,Quinn Kaitlin A6ORCID,Hassett Leslie C7,Carmona Loreto8ORCID,Ramiro Sofia910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS Trento, and Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Rheumatology , Trento, Italy

2. Rheumatology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin , Paris, France

3. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Rheumatology Division, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA

4. Department of Rheumatology, and Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital , Reykjavik, Iceland

5. Rheumatology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia , Italy

6. Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS , Bethesda, MD

7. Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA

8. Rheumatology, Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (InMusc) , Madrid, Spain

9. Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , Leiden

10. Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center , Heerlen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To systematically review the psychometric properties of outcome measurement instruments used in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to 14 July 2020 for validation studies of instruments used in AAV. Following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and OMERACT frameworks, different psychometric properties (validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility) were summarized. Risk of bias was assessed according to the COSMIN checklist. Results From 2505 articles identified, 32 met the predefined selection criteria, providing information on 22 instruments assessing disease activity (n = 7), damage (n = 2), activity and damage (n = 1), health-related quality of life (HRQoL; n = 9) and function (n = 3). Most of the instruments were tested in AAV as a group or in granulomatosis with polyangiitis only. The BVAS, any version, the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and the AAV-Patient-Reported Outcome (AAV-PRO) have been more extensively validated than the other instruments. BVAS for Wegener Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) has been shown to be valid for measuring disease activity [correlation with Physician global assessment (r = 0.90)], reliability (inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97), responsiveness and feasibility. For damage, VDI was shown to be moderately valid (correlations with BVAS version 3 at 6 months r = 0.14, BVAS/WG at 1 year r = 0.40 and 5 years r = 0.20), and feasible. For HRQoL, AAV-PRO demonstrated validity (correlations of the six AAV-PRO domains with EQ-5D-5L: −0.78 to −0.55; discrimination between active disease and remission, P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The overall performance of instruments assessing function was low-to-moderate. Conclusion Among the 22 outcome measurement instruments used for AAV, BVAS (any version), VDI and AAV-PRO had the strongest psychometric properties.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3