Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE

Author:

Mysler Eduardo1,Tanaka Yoshiya2ORCID,Kavanaugh Arthur3,Aletaha Daniel4,Taylor Peter C5ORCID,Song In-Ho6,Shaw Tim7,Song Yanna6,DeMasi Ryan6,Ali Mira6,Fleischmann Roy8

Affiliation:

1. Organización Medica de Investigación , Buenos Aires, Argentina

2. The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu, Japan

3. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, & Immunology, University of California San Diego Medical School , San Diego, CA, USA

4. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria

5. Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK

6. AbbVie , North Chicago, IL, USA

7. AbbVie Ltd , Maidenhead, UK

8. Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center , Dallas, TX, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. Methods Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy. Results This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6–8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib. Conclusion Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02629159

Funder

AbbVie, Inc

AstraZeneca

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3