A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI’PsA)

Author:

Lioté Frédéric12ORCID,Constantin Arnaud34,Dahan Étienne5,Quiniou Jean-Baptiste6,Frazier Aline2,Sibilia Jean78

Affiliation:

1. Université Paris Cité, UFR de Médecine , Paris, France

2. Rheumatology Department & INSERM U1132 Bioscar, Viggo Petersen Centre, Lariboisière Hospital , Paris, France

3. Rheumatology Department, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital , Toulouse, France

4. Université Toulouse III—Paul Sabatier & INSERM, 1291 Infinity , Toulouse, France

5. Rheumatology Department, UF 6501, Hautepierre Hospital , CHU Strasbourg, France

6. Amgen , Boulogne-Billancourt, France

7. Rheumatology Department, National Reference Centre for Rare Systemic Auto-immune Diseases East-South-West (RESO) , CHU Strasbourg, France

8. Molecular Immuno-Rhumatology Laboratory, GENOMAX platform, INSERM UMR-S1109, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute (ITI) of Precision Medicine of Strasbourg, Transplantex NG, Federation of Translational Medicine of Strasbourg (FMTS), University of Strasbourg , Strasbourg, France

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases (‘oligoarthritis’, ‘enthesitis’, ‘polyarthritis’, ‘neoplastic history’, ‘cardiovascular risk’) requiring treatment OPTImization, and two ‘control’ cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment—according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA. Results One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI’PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were ‘oligoarthritis’ and ‘enthesitis’ with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty (‘polyarthritis in relapse’, ‘neoplastic history’ and ‘cardiovascular risk’) generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment. Conclusion The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Funder

Amgen

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3