MRVAS—introducing a standardized magnetic resonance scoring system for assessing the extent of inflammatory burden in giant cell arteritis

Author:

Froehlich Matthias1,Guggenberger Konstanze V2,Vogt Marius3,Mihatsch Patrick W2,Dalla Torre Giulia2,Werner Rudolf A4,Gernert Michael1,Strunz Patrick P1,Portegys Jan1,Weng Andreas M2,Schmalzing Marc1,Bley Thorsten A2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology/Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany

2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany

3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg , Würzburg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Our aim was to introduce a standardized system for assessing the extent of GCA on MRI, i.e. the Magnetic Resonance Vasculitis Activity Score (MRVAS). To obtain a comprehensive view, we used an extensive MRI protocol including cranial vessels and the aorta with its branches. To test reliability, MRI was assessed by four readers with different levels of experience. Methods A total of 80 patients with suspected GCA underwent MRI of the cranial arteries and the aorta and its branches (20 vessel segments). Every vessel was rated dichotomous [inflamed (coded as 1) or not (coded as 0)], providing a summed score of 0–20. Blinded readers [two experienced radiologists (ExR) and two inexperienced radiologists (InR)] applied the MRVAS on an individual vessel and an overall level (defined as the highest score of any of the individual vessel scores). To determine interrater agreement, Cohen’s κ was calculated for pairwise comparison of each reader for individual vessel segments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the MRVAS. Results Concordance rates were excellent for both subcohorts on an individual vessel-based (GCA: ICC 0.95; non-GCA: ICC 0.96) and overall MRVAS level (GCA: ICC 0.96; non-GCA: ICC 1.0). Interrater agreement yielded significant concordance (P < 0.001) for all pairs (κ range 0.78–0.98). No significant differences between ExRs and InRs were observed (P = 0.38). Conclusion The proposed MRVAS allows standardized scoring of inflammation in GCA and achieved high agreement rates in a prospective setting.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference37 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neues in der Bildgebung von Großgefäßvaskulitiden;Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie;2024-09-13

2. Imaging Challenges and Developments in Large-vessel Vasculitis;Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3