Feasibility of conducting a cohort randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of a nurse-led package of care for knee pain

Author:

Fuller Amy123ORCID,Hall Michelle34,Nomikos Polykarpos Angelos135,Millar Bonnie123,Ogollah Reuben6ORCID,Valdes Ana123,Greenhaff Paul7,das Nair Roshan38910,Doherty Michael13,Walsh David A123,Abhishek Abhishek123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

2. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

3. Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

4. School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

5. School of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bolton , Bolton, UK

6. Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

7. School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

8. Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

9. Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences Unit, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, UK

10. Health Division, SINTEF , Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cohort randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a nurse-led package of care for knee pain and determining a treatment sequence for use in a future trial. Methods This study was an open-label, three-arm, single-centre, mixed-methods, feasibility cohort RCT. Adults aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe knee pain for ≥3 months were eligible. Participants were randomized into group A (non-pharmacological treatment first), group B (pharmacological treatment first), or group C (usual care). The intervention was delivered over 26 weeks. Outcomes were dropout rate, recruitment rate, intervention fidelity, ability to collect outcome data, and treatment acceptability. Results Seventeen participants were randomized and enrolled into each of groups A and B (5.2% recruitment rate), and 174 participants were randomized to group C. The participant characteristics at randomization were comparable across the three arms. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) paused the study from March–November 2020. Participants enrolled in groups A and B before March 2020 were withdrawn at the restart. Of the 20 participants enrolled after the restart, 18 completed the study (10% dropout). The nurse reported delivering most aspects of the intervention with high fidelity. The participants viewed the package of care as structured, supportive and holistic, they learnt about self-managing knee pain, and they could engage with and follow the non-pharmacological treatment. Most found the non-pharmacological treatment more useful than the pharmacological treatment, preferring to receive it before or alongside analgesia. Many self-report questionnaires were not fully completed. Conclusion The nurse-led package of care for knee pain was acceptable, with low dropout, although the cohort RCT design may not be feasible for a definitive trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03670706.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3