MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Author:

Barendregt Anouk M12ORCID,Veldkamp Saskia R1,Hissink Muller Petra C E3,van de Geer Annemarie4,Aarts Cathelijn4,van Gulik E Charlotte12,Schilham Marco W3,Kessel Christoph5,Keizer Mischa P4,Hemke Robert2,Nassar-Sheikh Rashid Amara1,Dolman Koert M67,Schonenberg-Meinema Dieneke1,ten Cate Rebecca3,van den Berg J Merlijn1,Maas Mario2,Kuijpers Taco W14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

3. Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden

4. Department of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Department of Paediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, University Children’s Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany

6. Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam

7. Department of Paediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Objective To study two neutrophil activation markers, myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8/14 and neutrophil elastase (NE), for their ability to predict treatment response and flare in patients with JIA. Methods Using samples from two cohorts (I and II), we determined MRP8/14 and NE levels of 32 (I) and 81 (II) patients with new-onset, DMARD-naïve arthritis and compared patients who responded to treatment (defined as fulfilling ≥ adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or inactive disease) with non-responders (defined as fulfilling < adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or active disease) at 6 and 12 months. Secondly, we compared biomarker levels of 54 (I) and 34 (II) patients with clinically inactive disease who did or did not suffer from a flare of arthritis after 6 or 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were carried out to study the predictive value of MRP8/14 and NE for treatment response and flare. Results For both cohorts, baseline MRP8/14 and NE levels for patients who did or did not respond to treatment were not different. Also, MRP8/14 and NE levels were not different in patients who did or did not flare. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of MRP8/14 and NE demonstrated areas under the curve <0.7 in both cohorts. Conclusion In our cohorts, MRP8/14 and NE could not predict treatment response. Also, when patients had inactive disease, neither marker could predict flares.

Funder

Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3