Benchmarking in Academic Physical Therapy: A Multicenter Trial Using the PT-GQ Survey
Author:
Shields Richard K1, Ambler Steven B, Audette Jennifer, Austin Gary P, Berg-Poppe Patti, Bowden Mark G, Buford John A, Chevan Julia, Christensen Nicole, Krasinski Debra Clayton, Costello Ellen, Decker Ann Marie, Dupre Anne-Marie, Ellis Terry D, Frank Lynn, Fulk George D, Gagnon Kendra, Galen Sujay Saphire, Healey William E, Irrgang James J, Kirk-Sanchez Neva, Mahoney Edward C, Maňago Marc M, Michael McKeough D, Merians Alma S, Miller Amy H, Nesbit Kathryn C, North Sara E, Pabian Patrick S, Peck Kirk, Silkwood-Sherer Debbie, Talley Susan Ann, van Duijn Arie J, Scott Ward R, Dudley-Javoroski Shauna1,
Affiliation:
1. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, 1-252 Medical Education Building, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objective
Academic physical therapy has no universal metrics by which educational programs can measure outcomes, limiting their ability to benchmark to their own historical performance, to peer institutions, or to other health care professions. The PT-Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) survey, adapted from the Association of American Medical Colleges’ GQ, addresses this gap by offering both inter-professional insight and fine-scale assessment of physical therapist education. This study reports the first wave of findings from an ongoing multi-site trial of the PT-GQ among diverse academic physical therapy programs, including (1) benchmarks for academic physical therapy, and (2) a comparison of the physical therapist student experience to medical education benchmarks.
Methods
Thirty-four doctor of physical therapy (DPT) programs (13.2% nationwide sample) administered the online survey to DPT graduates during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. PT-GQ and Association of American Medical Colleges data were contrasted via Welch’s unequal-variance t test and Hedges g (effect size).
Results
A total of 1025 respondents participated in the study (response rate: 63.9%). The average survey duration was 31.8 minutes. Overall educational satisfaction was comparable with medicine, and respondents identified areas of curricular strength (eg, anatomy) and weakness (eg, pharmacology). DPT respondents provided higher ratings of faculty professionalism than medicine, lower rates of student mistreatment, and a lesser impact of within-program diversity on their training. One-third of respondents were less than “satisfied” with student mental health services. DPT respondents reported significantly higher exhaustion but lower disengagement than medical students, along with lower tolerance for ambiguity. Of DPT respondents who reported educational debt, one-third reported debt exceeding $150,000, the threshold above which the DPT degree loses economic power.
Conclusions
These academic benchmarks, using the PT-GQ, provided insight into physical therapist education and identified differences between physical therapist and medical student perceptions.
Impact
This ongoing trial will establish a comprehensive set of benchmarks to better understand academic physical therapy outcomes.
Funder
APTA Academy of Education Clinical and Educational Pilot Grant University of Iowa Health Care Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|