Stabilization Exercises Versus Flexion Exercises in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Nava-Bringas Tania Inés1,Romero-Fierro Lizbeth Olivia2,Trani-Chagoya Yessica Patricia3,Macías-Hernández Salvador Israel1,García-Guerrero Eduardo4,Hernández-López Mario4,Roberto Coronado-Zarco1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitation “Luis Guillermo Ibarra”, México City, Mexico

2. Departamento de Rehabilitación, Hospital Naval de Tapachula, Tapachula, Chiapas, México

3. Departamento de Rehabilitación, Hospital General Naval de Lázaro Cárdenas, Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán, México

4. Departments of Physical Therapies, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación “Luis Guillermo Ibarra”

Abstract

Abstract Objective Exercise is the mainstay of treatment in individuals with low back pain and the first-line option in degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS); however, there is still no consensus surrounding the superiority of any specific exercise program. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercises and flexion exercises for pain control and improvements of disability in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and DS. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary public hospital and included 92 individuals over the age of 50 years who were randomly allocated to lumbar stabilization exercises or flexion exercises. Participants received 6 sessions of physical therapy (monthly appointments) and were instructed to execute exercises daily at home during the 6 months of the study. The primary outcome (measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) was pain intensity (visual analog scale, 0–100 mm) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index, from 0% to 100%). Secondary outcomes were disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, from 0 to 24 points), changes in body mass index, and flexibility (fingertip to floor, in centimeters) at baseline and 6 months, and also the total of days of analgesic use at 6-month follow-up. Results Mean differences between groups were not significant (for lumbar pain: 0.56 [95% CI = −11.48 to 12.61]; for radicular pain: −1.23 [95% CI = −14.11 to 11.64]; for Oswestry Disability Index: −0.61 [95% CI = −6.92 to 5.69]; for Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: 0.53 [95% CI = −1.69 to 2.76]). Conclusion The findings from the present study reveal that flexion exercises are not inferior to and offer a similar response to stabilization exercises for the control of pain and improvements of disability in individuals with CLBP and DS. Impact Exercise is the mainstay of treatment in individuals with CLBP and DS; however, there is still no consensus surrounding the superiority of any specific exercise program. This study finds that flexion exercises are not inferior to and offer a similar response to stabilization exercises. Lay Summary Exercise is the mainstay of treatment in individuals with CLBP and DS, but there is no consensus on the superiority of any specific exercise program. If you have DS, flexion exercises may provide similar effects to stabilization exercises.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3