Upper Quadrant Edema Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Lymphatic and Venous Disorders

Author:

Deutscher Daniel12,Hayes Deanna1,Cook Karon F3,Werneke Mark W1,Tucker Carole A4,Mioduski Jerome E1,Levenhagen Kim5,Tidhar Dorit6,Pfarr Megan7,Kallen Michael A8

Affiliation:

1. Net Health Systems, Inc, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

2. Maccabitech Institute for Research & Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel

3. FeralScholars, Broaddus, Texas, USA

4. Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

5. Program in Physical Therapy, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

6. Physical Therapy Department, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel

7. HSHS Wisconsin & Prevea Health, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA

8. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective The main aims of this study were to (1) create a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) item bank for measuring the impact of upper quadrant edema (UQE) on physical function by calibrating responses to newly developed items; and (2) assess reliability, validity, and administration efficiency of scores based on computerized adaptive test (CAT) and 10-item short-form (SF) administration modes. Methods This was a retrospective study including data from patients treated in outpatient rehabilitation clinics for UQE that responded to all 27 candidate items at intake. Item response theory model assumptions of unidimensionality, local item independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning were evaluated. UQE-CAT– and UQE-SF–generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency. Results The total cohort included 3486 patients (mean [SD] age = 61 [13] years; range = 14–89 years). After removing 2 items, a 25-item solution was supported for its unidimensionality and fit to the item response theory model with reliability estimates of more than 0.93 for scores based on both CAT and SF administration modes. No items demonstrated differential item functioning. Scores discriminated among multiple patient groups in clinically logical ways and were moderately responsive to change with negligible floor and acceptable ceiling effects. CAT scores were generated using an average of 5.6 items (median = 5). Conclusion Scores on the UQE PROM were reliable, valid, and efficient for assessing perceived physical function of patients with upper quadrant edema; thus, the measure is suitable for research and routine clinical administration. Impact The newly developed UQE PROM is reliable and valid and offers efficient administration modes for assessing perceived physical function of patients with UQE caused by lymphatic and venous disorders, both for research and routine clinical care in busy outpatient rehabilitation settings. As an item response theory–based measure, the UQE PROM allows administration of condition-specific functional questions with low response burden for patients. This study supports a transition to PROMs that are based on modern measurement approaches to achieve high accuracy and efficiency.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference75 articles.

1. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments;Gillespie;Gland Surg,2018

2. Upper extremity impairments in women with or without lymphedema following breast cancer treatment;Smoot;J Cancer Surviv,2010

3. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology;Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology;Lymphology,2020

4. Quality-of-life outcomes in surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review;Fish;JAMA Surg,2020

5. Does lymphedema severity affect quality of life? Simple question. Challenging answers;Lee;Lymphat Res Biol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3