Using Treatment Fidelity Measures to Understand Walking Recovery: A Secondary Analysis From the Community Ambulation Project

Author:

Mangione Kathleen K1,Posner Michael A2,Craik Rebecca L3,Wolff Edward F4,Fortinsky Richard H5,Beamer Brock A67,Binder Ellen F8,Orwig Denise L9,Magaziner Jay10,Resnick Barbara11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, 450 S Easton Rd, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA

2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA

3. College of Health Science, Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA

4. Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA

5. UConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA

6. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

7. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

8. Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA

9. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

10. School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

11. School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Physical therapist intervention studies can be deemed ineffective when, in fact, they may not have been delivered as intended. Measurement of treatment fidelity (TF) can address this issue. The purpose of this study was to describe TF of a home-based intervention, identify factors associated with TF, and examine whether components of TF were associated with the outcome of change in 6-minute walk distance (∆6MWD). Methods This is a secondary analysis of community-dwelling hip fracture participants who completed standard therapy and were randomly assigned to the active intervention (Push). Push was 16 weeks of lower extremity strengthening, function, and endurance training. TF was defined as delivery (attendance rate, exercise duration) and receipt (progression in training load, heart rate reserve [HRR] during endurance training, and exercise position [exercise on floor]). The outcome was ∆6MWD. Independent variables included baseline (demographic and clinical) measures. Descriptive statistics were calculated; linear and logistic regressions were performed. Results Eighty-nine participants were included in this analysis; 59 (66%) had attendance of 75% or greater. Participants walked for 20 minutes or more for 78% of sessions. The average training load increased by 22%; the mean HRR was 35%; and 61 (69%) participants exercised on the floor for at least 75% of sessions. Regression analyses showed that a higher body mass index and greater baseline 6MWD were related to components of TF; 4 out of 5 components of TF were significantly related to ∆6MWD. The strongest TF relationship showed that those who exercised on the floor improved by 62 m (95% CI = 31–93 m) more than those who did not get on the floor. Conclusions Measures of TF should extend beyond attendance rate. This analysis demonstrates how measures of TF, including program attendance, progression in training load, endurance duration, and exercising on the floor were significantly related to improvement in 6MWD in participants post hip fracture. Impact This careful analysis of treatment fidelity assured that the intervention was delivered and received as intended. Analysis of data from a large trial with participants after hip fracture showed that regular attendance, frequent endurance training for 20 minutes, increases in lower extremity training loads, and exercising on the floor were associated with improvements in the outcome of 6-minute-walk distance. The strongest association with improvement was exercising on the floor.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3