Affiliation:
1. St. Edward's University, Austin, Texas, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Secular bioethicists do not speak from a place of distinction, but from within particular culturally, socially, and historically conditioned standpoints. As partisans of moral and ideological agendas, they bring their own biases, prejudices, and worldviews to their roles as ethical consultants, social advocates, and academics, attempting rhetorically to sway others and shift policy to a preferred point of view. Their pronouncements represent just one voice among others, even when delivered with strident rhetoric, in an educated and knowing tone, from within institutional positions of power. This essay argues that, given the hegemony of progressive secular bioethics, traditional Christians routinely face epistemic injustice within medicine. That is, Christian knowledge regarding moral reality is all too often demeaned or dismissed, unless such norms can be translated into and defended within a secular ethos. Given such systemic bias, I argue, Christians also experience significant moral distress: they are fully aware of their moral obligations and what they ought to do, but institutionalized power structures make it nearly impossible to so act. But, Christian physicians are not mere technicians, obliged to provide whatever patients request from the list of legally available treatments. That antireligious critics seek to remove the rights of Christian physicians to limit how they practice medicine, where they do not offer or refer for abortion, euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other inappropriate forms of care, is unjustified and prejudicial, singling out Christians, and other religious groups, for singular treatment. Regardless of what the law requires or institutional policy demands, however, Christians are obliged to submit to God in all things. As a result, they may at times find themselves required to engage in acts of civil disobedience.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference40 articles.
1. ASBH statement on racial injustice and professionalism in bioethics and human humanities;American Society for Bioethics and Humanities,2020
2. Indexing burdens and benefits of treatment to age: Revisiting Paul Ramsey’s “medical indications” policy;Anderson;Christian Bioethics,2021
3. Is pregnancy really a Good Samaritan act?;Blackshaw;Christian Bioethics,2021
4. Discovery and revelation: The consciences of Christians, public policy, and bioethics debate;Brown;Christian Bioethics,2012
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Ethics of Conferencing;The American Journal of Bioethics;2024-03-26