Affiliation:
1. Franciscan University of Steubenville, Steubenville, Ohio, USA
Abstract
Abstract
I defend the position argued previously by Germain Grisez and me that total brain death is a valid criterion of death on the grounds that a human being is essentially a rational animal, and a brain-dead body lacks the radical capacity for rational actions. I reply to Josef Seifert’s objection that our positions rest on a reductionist view of the human person, and to other objections concerning the inter-relation between the human soul, its powers, and functions of the brain. I argue that a brain-dead body lacks the material dispositions needed for having the form or soul of a human being.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference33 articles.
1. Why do some doctors anesthetize brain-dead patients?;Aita,2000
2. Spontaneous movements often occur after brain death;American Academy of Neurology,2000
3. In defense of bodily integrity as a criterion for death: A response to the radical capacity argument;Austriaco;The Thomist,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献