Open Science in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: A Statement From the Behavioral Medicine Research Council

Author:

Segerstrom Suzanne C1ORCID,Diefenbach Michael A2ORCID,Hamilton Kyra34ORCID,O’Connor Daryl B5ORCID,Tomiyama A Janet6ORCID,Bacon Simon L,Bennett Gary G,Brondolo Elizabeth,Czajkowski Susan M,Davidson Karina W,Epel Elissa S,Revenson Tracey A,Ruiz John M,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky , 125 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044 , USA

2. Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Sciences, Northwell Health , Manhasset, NY , USA

3. Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology , Mt. Gravatt, QLD , Australia

4. Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California – Merced , Merced, CA , USA

5. School of Psychology, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK

6. Department of Psychology, University of California , Los Angeles, CA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Open Science practices include some combination of registering and publishing study protocols (including hypotheses, primary and secondary outcome variables, and analysis plans) and making available preprints of manuscripts, study materials, de-identified data sets, and analytic codes. This statement from the Behavioral Medicine Research Council (BMRC) provides an overview of these methods, including preregistration; registered reports; preprints; and open research. We focus on rationales for engaging in Open Science and how to address shortcomings and possible objections. Additional resources for researchers are provided. Research on Open Science largely supports positive consequences for the reproducibility and reliability of empirical science. There is no solution that will encompass all Open Science needs in health psychology and behavioral medicine’s diverse research products and outlets, but the BMRC supports increased use of Open Science practices where possible.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3