Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Author:

Boonmanunt Suparee1ORCID,Pattanaprateep Oraluck1ORCID,Ongphiphadhanakul Boonsong2ORCID,McKay Gareth3ORCID,Attia John45ORCID,Vlaev Ivo6ORCID,Thakkinstian Ammarin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University , 270 Rama VI Road, Pyathai, Bangkok 10400 , Thailand

2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University , 270 Rama VI Road, Pyathai, Bangkok 10400 , Thailand

3. Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast , 97 Lisburn Road, Whitla Medical Building, BT9 7BL Belfast , UK

4. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle , Kookaburra Circuit, John Hunter Hospital Campus, New Lambton, NSW 2305 , Australia

5. Hunter Medical Research Institute , Kookaburra Circuit, John Hunter Hospital Campus, New Lambton, NSW 2305 , Australia

6. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. Purpose To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. Methods A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. Results There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). Conclusion Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns.

Funder

National Research Council of Thailand

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology

Reference77 articles.

1. Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome;Carnethon;Diabetes Care.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3