Diagnosis and epidemiology of winged scapula in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Plaza Meza Milger P12,Marín Fermín Theodorakys3,Maffulli Nicola4567

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Periférico de Coche, Av. Intercomunal de El Valle con Calle Zea, 1090 Caracas, Venezuela

2. Clínica de Prevención del Cancer, Sociedad Anticancerosa de Venezuela, Av. Norte 3, Canónigos a Esperanza, N° 43, Parroquia Altagracia, 1010 Caracas, Venezuela

3. Department of Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Periférico de Coche, Av. Intercomunal de El Valle con Calle Zea, 1090 Caracas, Venezuela

4. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona, Via San Leonardo 1, 84131 Salerno, Italy

5. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, Italy

6. Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, UK

7. School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Winged scapula (WS) is a critical complication of axillary surgery in patients treated for breast cancer, and is associated with pain, impairment of the upper extremity’s function and poor performance in daily activities. Sources of data A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase and Virtual Health Library databases from January 1, 2000 to December 1, 2020. Clinical studies evaluating the diagnosis and epidemiology of WS among breast cancer surgery (BCS) patients were included. Areas of agreement The diagnosis of WS relies almost entirely on physical assessment. Studies have suggested a high variability in the report of the incidence of WS given the subjectivity of its diagnosis, and the different criteria used during clinical assessment. Areas of controversy The diagnosis of WS in BCS patients remains a challenge given the lack of standardized diagnostic protocols. Physical examination cannot rely on one manoeuvre only, as it may overlook patients with subtle injuries or overweight and contributing to the underreporting of its incidence. Growing points BCS patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection experience a significantly higher incidence of WS than those undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection. The global incidence of WS after BCS is 16.79%. Additionally, the anterior flexion test and the push-up test are the most commonly performed diagnostic manoeuvers. Areas timely for developing research Further studies should aim for objective diagnostic tests, especially when the condition is not evident.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3