Management of Gustilo–Anderson IIIB open tibial fractures in adults—a systematic review

Author:

Myatt A1,Saleeb H2,Robertson G A J3,Bourhill Jana Keren4ORCID,Page P R J5,Wood A M5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, ST4 Orthopaedic Registrar Leeds General Infirmary MRCSEd, Great George St, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

2. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Registrar Oxford University Hospital MRCS, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

3. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Registrar Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh FRCSEd (T&O), 51 Little France Cres, Old Dalkeith Rd, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK

4. Medical Sciences Divisional Office, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

5. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Trauma Fellow, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford, FRCS(T&O), Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Open tibial fractures are the most common open long bone fracture, despite this, the management of these complex injuries still remains a topic of discussion amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Sources of data We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar and a systematic review of 7500 articles, leaving 23 after exclusion criteria were applied, in order to analyse the management of open tibial fractures. Areas of agreement and controversy Infection was noted to be the most significant concern amongst authors, with definitive external fixation having a high rate of superficial pin-site infection and internal fixation having a high deep infection rate. Growing points It is essential to have a combined ortho-plastic approach to the management of these fractures as muscle flaps were the most common form of soft tissue coverage. Areas timely for developing research A national pragmatic trial into the management of open tibial fractures is required looking at fixation methods and soft tissue coverage, with at least a 2-year follow-up in order to ascertain the most appropriate management of these fractures and patient-related outcomes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3