Affiliation:
1. Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Abstract
Abstract
I study the origins of the market for corporate charters and the emergence of Delaware as the leader of this market. Specifically, I assemble new data on 19th- and 20th-century corporations to evaluate two widely held beliefs: (1) the U.S. Supreme Court is responsible for enabling a national market for corporate charters in the 19th century and (2) Delaware became the leader in this market only because New Jersey (the initial leader) repealed its extremely liberal corporate laws in 1913. I argue against both claims: The Supreme Court always opposed a national market for corporate charters, and New Jersey’s decline began a decade before its 1913 repeal. It is more likely that the market for corporate charters emerged as a collateral consequence of interstate commerce and that New Jersey declined because Delaware and other states simply copied its laws.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference51 articles.
1. American Business Corporations Before 1789;Baldwin,;The American Historical Review,1903
2. Federalism and the Corporation: The Desirable Limits on State Competition in Corporate Law;Bebchuk,;Harvard Law Review,1992
3. Vigorous Race or Leisurely Walk: Reconsidering the Competition over Corporate Charters;Bebchuk,;Yale Law Journal,2002
4. The Supreme Court’s View of Corporate Rights: Two Centuries of Evolution and Controversy;Blair,,2017