Reaffirming the Value of the Autopsy

Author:

Sathirareuangchai Sakda12ORCID,Shimizu David13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu

2. Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

3. Department of Pathology, Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To determine characteristic features of myocardial infarction (MI) diagnosed at autopsy and establish the incidence of discrepancy. Methods Autopsy cases at a tertiary hospital with a pathologic diagnosis of acute MI were evaluated for clinicopathologic features. Modified Goldman’s classification was used to classify discrepant cases. Results Of 529 autopsy cases, 19 (3.6%) demonstrated acute/subacute MI as a pathologic diagnosis. Thrombosis was identified in a minority of cases (3/19, 15.8%). Major clinicopathologic discrepancies were identified in four (21.1%) cases. Conclusions Although acute MI is an uncommon diagnosis rendered at hospital autopsy, a notable subset of cases demonstrates diagnostic discrepancy between the clinical impression and ultimate pathologic diagnosis. Interestingly, most MI cases in this series are not related to plaque disruption and thus best classified as a type 2 MI, which is associated with imbalance between oxygen demand and supply.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. CAP policies and documents pertaining to the autopsy.;College of American Pathologists,2017

2. The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist;Kuijpers;J Clin Pathol.,2014

3. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras;Goldman;N Engl J Med.,1983

4. Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study;Schwanda-Burger;Mod Pathol.,2012

5. Comparison of the clinical and post mortem diagnoses of the causes of death;Ermenc;Forensic Sci Int.,2000

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3