Outcome-Based Critical Result Thresholds in the Adult Patient Population

Author:

Tan Eng Hooi1,Yang Zhutian2,Li Yingda3,Metz Michael P4,Loh Tze Ping56

Affiliation:

1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Hospital, Singapore

2. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

3. Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, National University Hospital, Singapore

4. SA Pathology, The Women’s & Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

5. Biomedical Institution for Global Health and Technology, National University Hospital, Singapore

6. Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To derive outcome-based critical result thresholds in the adult patient population. Methods We extracted deidentified laboratory results and outcomes (death or discharged) of patients 18 years and older from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. The lower and upper critical result thresholds were obtained from the nearest minimum and maximum laboratory values, which corresponded to predicted probability of death at 90%. Results The critical value thresholds were sodium (<123, >153 mmol/L), potassium (<2.2, >6.6 mmol/L), bicarbonate (<15, >49 mmol/L), chloride (<82, >121 mmol/L), urea (>20 mmol/L), creatinine (>1,052 μmol/L), glucose (<1.5, >23.8 mmol/L), total calcium (<1.62, >2.95 mmol/L), magnesium (<0.37, >1.48 mmol/L), phosphate (<0.19, >2.52 mmol/L), pH (<7.22, >7.57), lactate (>5.0 mmol/L), hemoglobin (<4.6 g/dL), WBCs (>32 × 103/μL), prothrombin time (>90 seconds), and international normalized ratio (>10). Conclusions The indirect approach described in this study is a pragmatic way to obtain threshold values that are clinically and operationally meaningful.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. When to panic over abnormal values;Lundberg;Med Lab Obs.,1972

2. Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter);Lundberg;JAMA.,1990

3. Croatian survey on critical results reporting;Kopcinovic;Biochem Med (Zagreb).,2015

4. Critical values comparison: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes survey of 163 clinical laboratories;Wagar;Arch Pathol Lab Med.,2007

5. A survey of laboratory ‘critical (alert) limits’ in the UK;Tillman;Ann Clin Biochem.,2003

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3