Do patients who read visit notes on the patient portal have a higher rate of “loop closure” on diagnostic tests and referrals in primary care? A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Bell Sigall K1,Amat Maelys J1,Anderson Timothy S1,Aronson Mark D1,Benneyan James C2,Fernandez Leonor1,Ricci Dru A3,Salant Talya14,Schiff Gordon D35,Shafiq Umber1,Singer Sara J6,Sternberg Scot B1,Zhang Cancan1,Phillips Russell S13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02215, United States

2. Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute, Northeastern University , Boston, MA 02115, United States

3. Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, United States

4. Bowdoin Street Health Center , Dorchester, MA 02122, United States

5. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, United States

6. Department of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA 94305, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The 2021 US Cures Act may engage patients to help reduce diagnostic errors/delays. We examined the relationship between patient portal registration with/without note reading and test/referral completion in primary care. Materials and methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with visits from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021, and order for (1) colonoscopy, (2) dermatology referral for concerning lesions, or (3) cardiac stress test at 2 academic primary care clinics. We examined differences in timely completion (“loop closure”) of tests/referrals for (1) patients who used the portal and read ≥1 note (Portal + Notes); (2) those with a portal account but who did not read notes (Portal Account Only); and (3) those who did not register for the portal (No Portal). We estimated the predictive probability of loop closure in each group after adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical factors using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 12 849 tests/referrals, loop closure was more common among Portal+Note-readers compared to their counterparts for all tests/referrals (54.2% No Portal, 57.4% Portal Account Only, 61.6% Portal+Notes, P < .001). In adjusted analysis, compared to the No Portal group, the odds of loop closure were significantly higher for Portal Account Only (OR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), and Portal+Notes (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) groups. Beyond portal registration, note reading was independently associated with loop closure (P = .002). Discussion and conclusion Compared to no portal registration, the odds of loop closure were 20% higher in tests/referrals for patients with a portal account, and 40% higher in tests/referrals for note readers, after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors. However, important safety gaps from unclosed loops remain, requiring additional engagement strategies.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference60 articles.

1. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care

2. Factors associated with diagnostic error: an analysis of closed medical malpractice claims;Grenon;J Patient Saf,2023

3. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations;Singh;BMJ Qual Saf,2014

4. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care;Singh;BMJ Qual Saf,2017

5. Diagnostic trajectories in primary care at 12 months: an observational cohort study;Fontil;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3