Balancing digital information-sharing and patient privacy when engaging families in the intensive care unit

Author:

Brown Samuel M1,Aboumatar Hanan J2,Francis Leslie3,Halamka John4,Rozenblum Ronen5,Rubin Eileen6,Sarnoff Lee Barbara4,Sugarman Jeremy789,Turner Kathleen10,Vorwaller Micah3,Frosch Dominick L11,

Affiliation:

1. Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 S. Cottonwood St, Murray, UT USA and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

3. University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

5. Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

6. ARDS Foundation, Chicago, IL, USA

7. Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA

8. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA

9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

10. San Francisco Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

11. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, San Francisco, CA, USA and Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may lack decisional capacity and may depend on proxy decision makers (PDMs) to make medical decisions on their behalf. High-quality information-sharing with PDMs, including through such means as health information technology, could improve communication and decision making and could potentially minimize the psychological consequences of an ICU stay for both patients and their family members. However, alongside these anticipated benefits of information-sharing are risks of unwanted disclosure of sensitive information. Approaches to identifying the optimal balance between access to digital health information to facilitate engagement and protecting patient privacy are urgently needed. We identified eight themes that should be considered in balancing health information access and patient privacy: 1) potential benefits to patients from PDM data access; 2) potential harms to patients from such access; 3) the moral status of families within the patient-clinician relationship; 4) the scope of relevant information provided to PDMs; 5) issues around defining PDMs’ authority; 6) methods for eliciting and documenting patient preferences about their family’s information access; 7) the relevance of methods for ascertaining the identity of PDMs; and 8) the obligations of hospitals to prevent privacy breaches by PDMs. We conclude that PDMs should typically have access to health information from the current episode of care when the patient is decisionally impaired, unless the patient has previously expressed a clear preference that PDMs not have such access.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3