The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Tarver Will L1,Menachemi Nir2

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral Candidate, Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA

2. Professor and Chair, Health Policy and Management, Indiana University, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Health information technology (HIT) has the potential to play a significant role in the management of cancer. The purpose of this review is to identify and examine empirical studies that investigate the impact of HIT in cancer care on different levels of the care continuum. Methods Electronic searches were performed in four academic databases. The authors used a three-step search process to identify 122 studies that met specific inclusion criteria. Next, a coding sheet was used to extract information from each included article to use in an analysis. Logistic regression was used to determine study-specific characteristics that were associated with positive findings. Results Overall, 72.4% of published analyses reported a beneficial effect of HIT. Multivariate analysis found that the impact of HIT differs across the cancer continuum with studies targeting diagnosis and treatment being, respectively, 77 ( P  = .001) and 39 ( P  = .039) percentage points less likely to report a beneficial effect when compared to those targeting prevention. In addition, studies targeting HIT to patients were 31 percentage points less likely to find a beneficial effect than those targeting providers ( P  = .030). Lastly, studies assessing behavior change as an outcome were 41 percentage points less likely to find a beneficial effect ( P  = .006), while studies targeting decision making were 27 percentage points more likely to find a beneficial effect ( P  = .034). Conclusion Based on current evidence, HIT interventions seem to be more successful when targeting physicians, care in the prevention phase of the cancer continuum, and/or decision making. An agenda for future research is discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference50 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2012;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin.,2012

2. Cancer facts and figures;American Cancer Society,2015

3. Cancer prevention and early detection facts and figures;American Cancer Society,2013

4. Cancer disparities: causes and evidence-based solutions;Elk,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3