Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use

Author:

Turner Kea1,Hong Young-Rock1ORCID,Yadav Sandhya1,Huo Jinhai1,Mainous Arch G1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Patient portal functionalities, such as patient–physician e-communication, can benefit patients by improving clinical outcomes. Utilization has historically been low but may have increased in recent years due to the implementation of Stage 2 Meaningful Use for electronic health records. This study has 2 objectives: 1) to compare patient portal utilization rates before Stage 2 (2011–2013) and after Stage 2 (2014–2017), and 2) to examine whether disparities in patient portal utilization attenuate after Stage 2. Materials and Methods We conducted an observational study using a pooled cross-sectional analysis of 2011–2017 National Health Interview Survey data (n = 254 183). Results The mean percent use of patient portals significantly increased from the pre-Stage 2 to the post-Stage 2 period (6.9%, 95% CI, 6.2–7.5; P < .001). Non-Hispanic Black individuals (OR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.76–0.86; P < .0001) and Hispanic individuals (OR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.74–0.84; P < .0001) have lower odds of using patient portals compared to non-Hispanic White individuals. Although we found independent effects of race/ethnicity, we did not find a statistically significant interaction between race/ethnicity and time. We found a similar level of increase in patient portal utilization from the pre- to postperiod across racial and ethnic groups. Discussion Health care policies such as Stage 2 Meaningful Use are likely contributing to increased patient portal utilization across all patients and helping to attenuate disparities in utilization between subgroups of patients. Conclusion Further research is needed to explore which patient portal functionalities are perceived as most beneficial to patients and whether patients have access to those functionalities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference50 articles.

1. What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions;Oh;J Med Int Res,2005

2. Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: a literature review;Hardiker;Int J Med Inform,2011

3. A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health;Ricciardi;Health Aff (Millwood),2013

4. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries;Andreassen;BMC Public Health,2007

5. Potential of electronic personal health records;Pagliari;BMJ,2007

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3