Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care

Author:

Adler-Milstein Julia1,Embi Peter J2,Middleton Blackford3,Sarkar Indra Neil4,Smith Jeff5

Affiliation:

1. School of Information, Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA

3. Apervita Inc., Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

4. Center for Biomedical Informatics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

5. American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract While great progress has been made in digitizing the US health care system, today’s health information technology (IT) infrastructure remains largely a collection of systems that are not designed to support a transition to value-based care. In addition, the pursuit of value-based care, in which we deliver better care with better outcomes at lower cost, places new demands on the health care system that our IT infrastructure needs to be able to support. Provider organizations pursuing new models of health care delivery and payment are finding that their electronic systems lack the capabilities needed to succeed. The result is a chasm between the current health IT ecosystem and the health IT ecosystem that is desperately needed. In this paper, we identify a set of focal goals and associated near-term achievable actions that are critical to pursue in order to enable the health IT ecosystem to meet the acute needs of modern health care delivery. These ideas emerged from discussions that occurred during the 2015 American Medical Informatics Association Policy Invitational Meeting. To illustrate the chasm and motivate our recommendations, we created a vignette from the multistakeholder perspectives of a patient, his provider, and researchers/innovators. It describes an idealized scenario in which each stakeholder’s needs are supported by an integrated health IT environment. We identify the gaps preventing such a reality today and present associated policy recommendations that serve as a blueprint for critical actions that would enable us to cross the current health IT chasm by leveraging systems and information to routinely deliver high-value care.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference43 articles.

1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. U.S. hospital adoption of patient engagement functionalities. Health IT Quick-Stat #24. September 2016. http://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-Adoption-of-Patient-Engagement-Functionalities.php. Accessed December 20, 2016.

2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Cancer Clinical Trials and the NCI Cooperative Group Program; NassSJ, MosesHL, MendelsohnJ, eds. A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010. 4, Physician and Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220370/. Accessed November 8, 2016.

3. Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey;Henderson;Genome Med.,2013

4. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Percent of Hospitals, by Type, that Possess Certified Health IT. Health IT Quick-Stat #52. May 2016. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/certified-electronic-health-record-technology-in-hospitals.php. Accessed February 28, 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3