A value set for documenting adverse reactions in electronic health records

Author:

Goss Foster R1,Lai Kenneth H2,Topaz Maxim34,Acker Warren W3,Kowalski Leigh3,Plasek Joseph M23,Blumenthal Kimberly G56,Seger Diane L7,Slight Sarah P348,Wah Fung Kin9,Chang Frank Y7,Bates David W246,Zhou Li3610

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

3. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

4. Division of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK

5. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, and Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

7. Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA

8. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK

9. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA

10. Clinical Informatics, Partners eCare, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To develop a comprehensive value set for documenting and encoding adverse reactions in the allergy module of an electronic health record. Materials and Methods We analyzed 2 471 004 adverse reactions stored in Partners Healthcare’s Enterprise-wide Allergy Repository (PEAR) of 2.7 million patients. Using the Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning, and Mapping System, we processed both structured and free-text reaction entries and mapped them to Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms. We calculated the frequencies of reaction concepts, including rare, severe, and hypersensitivity reactions. We compared PEAR concepts to a Federal Health Information Modeling and Standards value set and University of Nebraska Medical Center data, and then created an integrated value set. Results We identified 787 reaction concepts in PEAR. Frequently reported reactions included: rash (14.0%), hives (8.2%), gastrointestinal irritation (5.5%), itching (3.2%), and anaphylaxis (2.5%). We identified an additional 320 concepts from Federal Health Information Modeling and Standards and the University of Nebraska Medical Center to resolve gaps due to missing and partial matches when comparing these external resources to PEAR. This yielded 1106 concepts in our final integrated value set. The presence of rare, severe, and hypersensitivity reactions was limited in both external datasets. Hypersensitivity reactions represented roughly 20% of the reactions within our data. Discussion We developed a value set for encoding adverse reactions using a large dataset from one health system, enriched by reactions from 2 large external resources. This integrated value set includes clinically important severe and hypersensitivity reactions. Conclusion This work contributes a value set, harmonized with existing data, to improve the consistency and accuracy of reaction documentation in electronic health records, providing the necessary building blocks for more intelligent clinical decision support for allergies and adverse reactions.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3