Evaluation of GPT-4 ability to identify and generate patient instructions for actionable incidental radiology findings

Author:

Woo Kar-mun C1,Simon Gregory W1,Akindutire Olumide1,Aphinyanaphongs Yindalon23,Austrian Jonathan S34,Kim Jung G15,Genes Nicholas13,Goldenring Jacob A1,Major Vincent J23ORCID,Pariente Chloé S3,Pineda Edwin G6,Kang Stella K27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY 10016, United States

2. Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY 10016, United States

3. Department of Health Informatics, Medical Center IT, NYU Langone Health , New York, NY 10016, United States

4. Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY 10016, United States

5. Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016 , United States

6. MCIT Clinical Systems—ASAP application, NYU Langone Health , New York, NY 10016, United States

7. Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY 10016, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the proficiency of a HIPAA-compliant version of GPT-4 in identifying actionable, incidental findings from unstructured radiology reports of Emergency Department patients. To assess appropriateness of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated, patient-facing summaries of these findings. Materials and Methods Radiology reports extracted from the electronic health record of a large academic medical center were manually reviewed to identify non-emergent, incidental findings with high likelihood of requiring follow-up, further sub-stratified as “definitely actionable” (DA) or “possibly actionable—clinical correlation” (PA-CC). Instruction prompts to GPT-4 were developed and iteratively optimized using a validation set of 50 reports. The optimized prompt was then applied to a test set of 430 unseen reports. GPT-4 performance was primarily graded on accuracy identifying either DA or PA-CC findings, then secondarily for DA findings alone. Outputs were reviewed for hallucinations. AI-generated patient-facing summaries were assessed for appropriateness via Likert scale. Results For the primary outcome (DA or PA-CC), GPT-4 achieved 99.3% recall, 73.6% precision, and 84.5% F-1. For the secondary outcome (DA only), GPT-4 demonstrated 95.2% recall, 77.3% precision, and 85.3% F-1. No findings were “hallucinated” outright. However, 2.8% of cases included generated text about recommendations that were inferred without specific reference. The majority of True Positive AI-generated summaries required no or minor revision. Conclusion GPT-4 demonstrates proficiency in detecting actionable, incidental findings after refined instruction prompting. AI-generated patient instructions were most often appropriate, but rarely included inferred recommendations. While this technology shows promise to augment diagnostics, active clinician oversight via “human-in-the-loop” workflows remains critical for clinical implementation.

Funder

NYU Langone Health

MCIT

NIH

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Large language models in biomedicine and health: current research landscape and future directions;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association;2024-08-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3