Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms

Author:

Mo Huan1,Thompson William K2,Rasmussen Luke V3,Pacheco Jennifer A4,Jiang Guoqian5,Kiefer Richard5,Zhu Qian6,Xu Jie7,Montague Enid7,Carrell David S8,Lingren Todd9,Mentch Frank D10,Ni Yizhao9,Wehbe Firas H3,Peissig Peggy L11,Tromp Gerard12,Larson Eric B8,Chute Christopher G13,Pathak Jyotishman514,Denny Joshua C115,Speltz Peter1,Kho Abel N7,Jarvik Gail P1617,Bejan Cosmin A1,Williams Marc S17,Borthwick Kenneth18,Kitchner Terrie E11,Roden Dan M1519,Harris Paul A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

2. Center for Biomedical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA

3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

4. Center for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

5. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

6. Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

8. Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

9. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA

10. Center for Applied Genomics, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

11. Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA

12. Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa

13. Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

14. Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

15. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

16. Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

17. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

18. The Sigfried and Janet Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA

19. Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used for clinical and translational research through the creation of phenotype algorithms. Currently, phenotype algorithms are most commonly represented as noncomputable descriptive documents and knowledge artifacts that detail the protocols for querying diagnoses, symptoms, procedures, medications, and/or text-driven medical concepts, and are primarily meant for human comprehension. We present desiderata for developing a computable phenotype representation model (PheRM). Methods A team of clinicians and informaticians reviewed common features for multisite phenotype algorithms published in PheKB.org and existing phenotype representation platforms. We also evaluated well-known diagnostic criteria and clinical decision-making guidelines to encompass a broader category of algorithms. Results We propose 10 desired characteristics for a flexible, computable PheRM: (1) structure clinical data into queryable forms; (2) recommend use of a common data model, but also support customization for the variability and availability of EHR data among sites; (3) support both human-readable and computable representations of phenotype algorithms; (4) implement set operations and relational algebra for modeling phenotype algorithms; (5) represent phenotype criteria with structured rules; (6) support defining temporal relations between events; (7) use standardized terminologies and ontologies, and facilitate reuse of value sets; (8) define representations for text searching and natural language processing; (9) provide interfaces for external software algorithms; and (10) maintain backward compatibility. Conclusion A computable PheRM is needed for true phenotype portability and reliability across different EHR products and healthcare systems. These desiderata are a guide to inform the establishment and evolution of EHR phenotype algorithm authoring platforms and languages.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference112 articles.

1. Mechanistic phenotypes: an aggregative phenotyping strategy to identify disease mechanisms using GWAS data;Mosley;PLoS ONE.,2013

2. EMR-linked GWAS study: investigation of variation landscape of loci for body mass index in children;Namjou;Front Genet.,2013

3. Mining the human phenome using semantic web technologies: a case study for Type 2 Diabetes;Pathak;AMIA Annu Symp Proc AMIA Symp AMIA Symp.,2012

4. Systematic identification of risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease through shared genetic architecture and electronic medical records;Li;Pac Symp Biocomput Pac Symp Biocomput.,2013

5. Variants near FOXE1 are associated with hypothyroidism and other thyroid conditions: using electronic medical records for genome- and phenome-wide studies;Denny;Am J Hum Genet.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3