Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study

Author:

Giardina Traber D12,Baldwin Jessica12,Nystrom Daniel T3,Sittig Dean F4,Singh Hardeep12

Affiliation:

1. Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA

2. Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, and VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Online portals provide patients with access to their test results, but it is unknown how patients use these tools to manage results and what information is available to promote understanding. We conducted a mixed-methods study to explore patients’ experiences and preferences when accessing their test results via portals. Materials and Methods We conducted 95 interviews (13 semistructured and 82 structured) with adults who viewed a test result in their portal between April 2015 and September 2016 at 4 large outpatient clinics in Houston, Texas. Semistructured interviews were coded using content analysis and transformed into quantitative data and integrated with the structured interview data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the structured data. Results Nearly two-thirds (63%) did not receive any explanatory information or test result interpretation at the time they received the result, and 46% conducted online searches for further information about their result. Patients who received an abnormal result were more likely to experience negative emotions (56% vs 21%; P = .003) and more likely to call their physician (44% vs 15%; P = .002) compared with those who received normal results. Discussion Study findings suggest that online portals are not currently designed to present test results to patients in a meaningful way. Patients experienced negative emotions often with abnormal results, but sometimes even with normal results. Simply providing access via portals is insufficient; additional strategies are needed to help patients interpret and manage their online test results. Conclusion Given the absence of national guidance, our findings could help strengthen policy and practice in this area and inform innovations that promote patient understanding of test results.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference32 articles.

1. CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients’ access to test reports (42 CFR 493, 45 CFR 164);US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services;Fed Reg.,2011

2. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services;Health Information Technology: Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition; Revisions to the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology;Fed Reg.,2012

3. Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative;Baldwin;BMC Fam Pract.,2005

Cited by 87 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3