Are medical history data fit for risk stratification of patients with chest pain in emergency care? Comparing data collected from patients using computerized history taking with data documented by physicians in the electronic health record in the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study

Author:

Brandberg Helge1ORCID,Sundberg Carl Johan23ORCID,Spaak Jonas1ORCID,Koch Sabine2ORCID,Kahan Thomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm SE-182 88, Sweden

2. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden

3. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Objective In acute chest pain management, risk stratification tools, including medical history, are recommended. We compared the fraction of patients with sufficient clinical data obtained using computerized history taking software (CHT) versus physician-acquired medical history to calculate established risk scores and assessed the patient-by-patient agreement between these 2 ways of obtaining medical history information. Materials and methods This was a prospective cohort study of clinically stable patients aged ≥ 18 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) at Danderyd University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) in 2017-2019 with acute chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG and serum markers. Medical histories were self-reported using CHT on a tablet. Observations on discrete variables in the risk scores were extracted from electronic health records (EHR) and the CHT database. The patient-by-patient agreement was described by Cohen’s kappa statistics. Results Of the total 1000 patients included (mean age 55.3 ± 17.4 years; 54% women), HEART score, EDACS, and T-MACS could be calculated in 75%, 74%, and 83% by CHT and in 31%, 7%, and 25% by EHR, respectively. The agreement between CHT and EHR was slight to moderate (kappa 0.19-0.70) for chest pain characteristics and moderate to almost perfect (kappa 0.55-0.91) for risk factors. Conclusions CHT can acquire and document data for chest pain risk stratification in most ED patients using established risk scores, achieving this goal for a substantially larger number of patients, as compared to EHR data. The agreement between CHT and physician-acquired history taking is high for traditional risk factors and lower for chest pain characteristics. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03439449

Funder

Robert Bosch Stiftung

Region Stockholm

Danderyd University Hospital

Karolinska Institutet

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference41 articles.

1. Description of chest pain patients in a Norwegian emergency department;Bjornsen;Scand Cardiovasc J,2019

2. Chest pain in the emergency department: incidence, clinical characteristics and risk stratification;Martinez-Selles;Rev Esp Cardiol,2008

3. The health care burden of acute chest pain;Goodacre;Heart,2005

4. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes;Byrne;Eur Heart J,2023

5. Emergency department crowding associated with increased 30-day mortality: a cohort study in Stockholm Region, Sweden, 2012 to 2016;Af Ugglas;J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3