A national survey assessing the number of records allowed open in electronic health records at hospitals and ambulatory sites

Author:

Adelman Jason S123,Berger Matthew A4,Rai Amisha3,Galanter William L5,Lambert Bruce L6,Schiff Gordon D7,Vawdrey David K23,Green Robert A23,Salmasian Hojjat23,Koppel Ross8,Schechter Clyde B9,Applebaum Jo R3,Southern William N10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

3. Division of Quality and Patient Safety, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

5. Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

6. Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

9. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

10. Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract To reduce the risk of wrong-patient errors, safety experts recommend limiting the number of patient records providers can open at once in electronic health records (EHRs). However, it is unknown whether health care organizations follow this recommendation or what rationales drive their decisions. To address this gap, we conducted an electronic survey via 2 national listservs. Among 167 inpatient and outpatient study facilities using EHR systems designed to open multiple records at once, 44.3% were configured to allow ≥3 records open at once (unrestricted), 38.3% allowed only 1 record open (restricted), and 17.4% allowed 2 records open (hedged). Decision-making centered on efforts to balance safety and efficiency, but there was disagreement among organizations about how to achieve that balance. Results demonstrate no consensus on the number of records to be allowed open at once in EHRs. Rigorous studies are needed to determine the optimal number of records that balances safety and efficiency.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference17 articles.

1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Certified Health IT Vendors and Editions Reported by Hospitals Participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, Health IT Quick-Stat #29. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Vendors-of-EHRs-to-Participating-Hospitals.php. July 2016. Accessed September 30, 2016.

2. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Office-based Physician Electronic Health Record Adoption: 2004–2014, Health IT Quick-Stat #50. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php. September 2015. Accessed September 30, 2016.

3. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Data Documentation, Office-based Health Care Providers. 2011–2013. http://dashboard.healthit.gov/datadashboard/documentation/ska-data-documentation.php Accessed September 30, 2016.

4. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors;Koppel;JAMA.,2005

5. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care: an interactive sociotechnical analysis;Harrison;J Am Med Inform Assoc.,2007

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3