Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults

Author:

Mangal Sabrina1ORCID,Park Leslie1,Reading Turchioe Meghan1ORCID,Choi Jacky1,Niño de Rivera Stephanie1,Myers Annie1,Goyal Parag2,Dugdale Lydia3,Masterson Creber Ruth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, New York, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, New York, USA

3. Department of Medicine, Columbia University , New York, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Participation in healthcare research shapes health policy and practice; however, low trust is a barrier to participation. We evaluated whether returning health information (information transparency) and disclosing intent of data use (intent transparency) impacts trust in research. Materials and Methods We conducted an online survey with a representative sample of 502 US adults. We assessed baseline trust and change in trust using 6 use cases representing the Social-Ecological Model. We assessed descriptive statistics and associations between trust and sociodemographic variables using logistic and multinomial regression. Results Most participants (84%) want their health research information returned. Black/African American participants were more likely to increase trust in research with individual information transparency (odds ratio (OR) 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–4.34]) and with intent transparency when sharing with chosen friends and family (3.66 [1.98–6.77]), doctors and nurses (1.96 [1.10–3.65]), or health tech companies (1.87 [1.02–3.40]). Asian, Native American or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Multirace, and individuals with a race not listed, were more likely to increase trust when sharing with health policy makers (1.88 [1.09–3.30]). Women were less likely to increase trust when sharing with friends and family (0.55 [0.35–0.87]) or health tech companies (0.46 [0.31–0.70]). Discussion Participants wanted their health information returned and would increase their trust in research with transparency when sharing health information. Conclusion Trust in research is influenced by interrelated factors. Future research should recruit diverse samples with lower baseline trust levels to explore changes in trust, with variation on the type of information shared.

Funder

National Institute of Nursing Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference54 articles.

1. Building patient trust in hospitals: a combination of hospital-related factors and health care clinician behaviors;Greene;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2021

2. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials;Braunstein;Medicine,2008

3. A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: the community VOICES study;Smirnoff;AJOB Empir Bioeth,2018

4. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation;Scharff;J Health Care Poor Underserved,2010

5. Informatics-enabled citizen science to advance health equity;Valdez;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3