Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerful strategies for design and implementation

Author:

Ray Jessica M1,Ratwani Raj M2,Sinsky Christine A3,Frankel Richard M45,Friedberg Mark W67,Powsner Seth M18,Rosenthal David I910,Wachter Robert M11,Melnick Edward R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

2. National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA

3. Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA

4. Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

5. Education Institute of Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

6. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA

7. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

10. Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut, West Haven, Connecticut, USA

11. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA

Abstract

Abstract Healthcare information technologies are now a routine component of patient–clinician interactions. Originally designed for operational functions including billing and regulatory compliance, these systems have had unintended consequences including increased exam room documentation, divided attention during the visit, and use of scribes to alleviate documentation burdens. In an age in which technology is ubiquitous in everyday life, we must re-envision healthcare technology to support both clinical operations and, above all, the patient–clinician relationship. We present 6 habits for designing user-centered health technologies: (1) put patient care first, (2) assemble a team with the right skills, (3) relentlessly ask WHY, (4) keep it simple, (5) be Darwinian, and (6) don’t lose the forest for the trees. These habits should open dialogues between developers, implementers, end users, and stakeholders, as well as outline a path for better, more usable technology that puts patients and their clinicians back at the center of care.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference55 articles.

1. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals;Jha;N Engl J Med,2009

2. Launching HITECH;Blumenthal;N Engl J Med,2010

3. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008-2015;Henry;ONC Data Brief,2016

4. Office-based Health Care Professionals Participating in the CMS EHR Incentive Programs;The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information;Health IT Quick-Stat #44,2017

5. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems;Sittig;Qual Saf Health Care,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3