Potential benefit of electronic pharmacy claims data to prevent medication history errors and resultant inpatient order errors

Author:

Pevnick Joshua M1,Palmer Katherine A2,Shane Rita23,Wu Cindy N2,Bell Douglas S45,Diaz Frank2,Cook-Wiens Galen6,Jackevicius Cynthia A7891011

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA

2. Department of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA

3. UCSF School of Pharmacy

4. RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA, USA

5. UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Research Informatics Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

7. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA

8. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada

9. Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

10. Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA

11. University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objective We sought to assess the potential of a widely available source of electronic medication data to prevent medication history errors and resultant inpatient order errors. Methods We used admission medication history (AMH) data from a recent clinical trial that identified 1017 AMH errors and 419 resultant inpatient order errors among 194 hospital admissions of predominantly older adult patients on complex medication regimens. Among the subset of patients for whom we could access current Surescripts electronic pharmacy claims data (SEPCD), two pharmacists independently assessed error severity and our main outcome, which was whether SEPCD (1) was unrelated to the medication error; (2) probably would not have prevented the error; (3) might have prevented the error; or (4) probably would have prevented the error. Results Seventy patients had both AMH errors and current, accessible SEPCD. SEPCD probably would have prevented 110 (35%) of 315 AMH errors and 46 (31%) of 147 resultant inpatient order errors. When we excluded the least severe medication errors, SEPCD probably would have prevented 99 (47%) of 209 AMH errors and 37 (61%) of 61 resultant inpatient order errors. SEPCD probably would have prevented at least one AMH error in 42 (60%) of 70 patients. Conclusion When current SEPCD was available for older adult patients on complex medication regimens, it had substantial potential to prevent AMH errors and resultant inpatient order errors, with greater potential to prevent more severe errors. Further study is needed to measure the benefit of SEPCD in actual use at hospital admission.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference29 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3