Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics

Author:

Ding Xiruo1,Gellad Ziad F23,Mather Chad2,Barth Pamela4,Poon Eric G4,Newman Mark5,Goldstein Benjamin A16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 27703, USA

3. Department of Medicine, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA

4. Duke Health Technology Solutions, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 27713, USA

5. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, USA

6. Center for Predictive Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, 27705, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective As available data increases, so does the opportunity to develop risk scores on more refined patient populations. In this paper we assessed the ability to derive a risk score for a patient no-showing to a clinic visit. Methods Using data from 2 264 235 outpatient appointments we assessed the performance of models built across 14 different specialties and 55 clinics. We used regularized logistic regression models to fit and assess models built on the health system, specialty, and clinic levels. We evaluated fits based on their discrimination and calibration. Results Overall, the results suggest that a relatively robust risk score for patient no-shows could be derived with an average C-statistic of 0.83 across clinic level models and strong calibration. Moreover, the clinic specific models, even with lower training set sizes, often performed better than the more general models. Examination of the individual models showed that risk factors had different degrees of predictability across the different specialties. Implementation of optimal modeling strategies would lead to capturing an additional 4819 no-shows per-year. Conclusion Overall, this work highlights both the opportunity for and the importance of leveraging the available electronic health record data to develop more refined risk models.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Career Development

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institutes of Health

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3