Challenges and opportunities using online portals to recruit diverse patients to behavioral trials

Author:

Tabriz Amir Alishahi1,Fleming Patrice Jordan1,Shin Yongyun2,Resnicow Ken3,Jones Resa M4,Flocke Susan A5,Shires Deirdre A6,Hawley Sarah T7,Willens David8,Lafata Jennifer Elston189

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA

3. Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

5. Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA

6. School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Center for Health Communications Research, University of Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

8. Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA

9. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

Abstract We describe the use of an online patient portal to recruit and enroll primary care patients in a randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decision support program. We use multiple logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with trial recruitment, enrollment, and engagement. We found that compared to Whites, Blacks had lower odds of viewing the portal message (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.37–0.57), opening the attached link containing the study material (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62–0.92), and consenting to participate in the trial (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67–0.93). We also found that compared to Whites, Asians had lower odds of viewing the portal message (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33–0.64), opening the attached link containing the study material (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.54–0.97), consenting to participate in the trial (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53–0.95), and completing the trial’s baseline questionnaire (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.90). While portals offer an opportunity to mitigate human bias in trial invitations, because of racial disparities—not only in who has a portal account, but in how they interact with trial recruitment and enrollment material within the portal—using portals alone for trial recruitment may generate study samples that are not racially diverse.

Funder

Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3