I had not time to make it shorter: an exploratory analysis of how physicians reduce note length and time in notes

Author:

Apathy Nate C12ORCID,Hare Allison J3,Fendrich Sarah4,Cross Dori A5

Affiliation:

1. National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute , Washington, District of Columbia, USA

2. Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute , Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

3. Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment & Resources, Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University , Stanford, California, USA

5. Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective We analyze observed reductions in physician note length and documentation time, 2 contributors to electronic health record (EHR) burden and burnout. Materials and Methods We used EHR metadata from January to May, 2021 for 130 079 ambulatory physician Epic users. We identified cohorts of physicians who decreased note length and/or documentation time and analyzed changes in their note composition. Results 37 857 physicians decreased either note length (n = 15 647), time in notes (n = 15 417), or both (n = 6793). Note length decreases were primarily attributable to reductions in copy/paste text (average relative change of –18.9%) and templated text (–17.2%). Note time decreases were primarily attributable to reductions in manual text (–27.3%) and increases in note content from other care team members (+21.1%). Discussion Organizations must consider priorities and tradeoffs in the distinct approaches needed to address different contributors to EHR burden. Conclusion Future research should explore scalable burden-reduction initiatives responsive to both note bloat and documentation time.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine

National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

University of Minnesota

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3