Predicting mortality over different time horizons: which data elements are needed?

Author:

Goldstein Benjamin A12,Pencina Michael J12,Montez-Rath Maria E3,Winkelmayer Wolfgang C4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

2. Center for Predictive Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina

3. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,

4. Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Abstract

Objective: Electronic health records (EHRs) are a resource for “big data” analytics, containing a variety of data elements. We investigate how different categories of information contribute to prediction of mortality over different time horizons among patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Material and Methods: We derived prediction models for mortality over 7 time horizons using EHR data on older patients from a national chain of dialysis clinics linked with administrative data using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression. We assessed how different categories of information relate to risk assessment and compared discrete models to time-to-event models. Results: The best predictors used all the available data (c-statistic ranged from 0.72–0.76), with stronger models in the near term. While different variable groups showed different utility, exclusion of any particular group did not lead to a meaningfully different risk assessment. Discrete time models performed better than time-to-event models. Conclusions: Different variable groups were predictive over different time horizons, with vital signs most predictive for near-term mortality and demographic and comorbidities more important in long-term mortality.

Funder

Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Gordon A. Cain Chair in Nephrology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3