Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights

Author:

Wang Michael12,Pantell Matthew S34,Gottlieb Laura M456,Adler-Milstein Julia12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Clinical Informatics & Improvement Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

2. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

4. Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

5. Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

6. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Electronic Health Records (EHRs) increasingly include designated fields to capture social determinants of health (SDOH). We developed measures to characterize their use, and use of other SDOH data types, to optimize SDOH data integration. Materials and Methods We developed 3 measures that accommodate different EHR data types on an encounter or patient-year basis. We implemented these measures—documented during encounter (DDE) captures documentation occurring during the encounter; documented by discharge (DBD) includes DDE plus documentation occurring any time prior to admission; and reviewed during encounter (RDE) captures whether anyone reviewed documented data—for the newly available structured SDOH fields and 4 other comparator SDOH data types (problem list, inpatient nursing question, social history free text, and social work notes) on a hospital encounter basis (with patient-year metrics in the Supplementary Appendix). Our sample included all patients (n = 27 127) with at least one hospitalization at UCSF Health (a large, urban, tertiary medical center) over a 1-year period. Results We observed substantial variation in the use of different SDOH EHR data types. Notably, social history question fields (newly added at study period start) were rarely used (DDE: 0.03% of encounters, DBD: 0.26%, RDE: 0.03%). Free-text patient social history fields had higher use (DDE: 12.1%, DBD: 49.0%, RDE: 14.4%). Discussion Our measures of real-world SDOH data use can guide current efforts to capture and leverage these data. For our institution, measures revealed substantial variation across data types, suggesting the need to engage in efforts such as EHR-user education and targeted workflow integration. Conclusion Measures revealed opportunities to optimize SDOH data documentation and review.

Funder

The Lisa & John Pritzker Family Fund

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference21 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3