Active neural networks to detect mentions of changes to medication treatment in social media

Author:

Weissenbacher Davy1ORCID,Ge Suyu2ORCID,Klein Ari1ORCID,O’Connor Karen1ORCID,Gross Robert1ORCID,Hennessy Sean1ORCID,Gonzalez-Hernandez Graciela1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

2. Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Abstract Objective We address a first step toward using social media data to supplement current efforts in monitoring population-level medication nonadherence: detecting changes to medication treatment. Medication treatment changes, like changes to dosage or to frequency of intake, that are not overseen by physicians are, by that, nonadherence to medication. Despite the consequences, including worsening health conditions or death, 50% of patients are estimated to not take medications as indicated. Current methods to identify nonadherence have major limitations. Direct observation may be intrusive or expensive, and indirect observation through patient surveys relies heavily on patients’ memory and candor. Using social media data in these studies may address these limitations. Methods We annotated 9830 tweets mentioning medications and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to find mentions of medication treatment changes, regardless of whether the change was recommended by a physician. We used active and transfer learning from 12 972 reviews we annotated from WebMD to address the class imbalance of our Twitter corpus. To validate our CNN and explore future directions, we annotated 1956 positive tweets as to whether they reflect nonadherence and categorized the reasons given. Results Our CNN achieved 0.50 F1-score on this new corpus. The manual analysis of positive tweets revealed that nonadherence is evident in a subset with 9 categories of reasons for nonadherence. Conclusion We showed that social media users publicly discuss medication treatment changes and may explain their reasons including when it constitutes nonadherence. This approach may be useful to supplement current efforts in adherence monitoring.

Funder

National Library of Medicine

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference42 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3