Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal

Author:

Cronin Robert M123,Conway Douglas4,Condon David5,Jerome Rebecca N4,Byrne Daniel W1246,Harris Paul A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

4. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

5. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

6. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Over the past decade, public interest in managing health-related information for personal understanding and self-improvement has rapidly expanded. This study explored aspects of how patient-provided health information could be obtained through an electronic portal and presented to inform and engage patients while also providing information for healthcare providers. Methods We invited participants using ResearchMatch from 2 cohorts: (1) self-reported healthy volunteers (no medical conditions) and (2) individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression. Participants used a secure web application (dashboard) to complete the PROMIS® domain survey(s) and then complete a feedback survey. A community engagement studio with 5 healthcare providers assessed perspectives on the feasibility and features of a portal to collect and display patient provided health information. We used bivariate analyses and regression analyses to determine differences between cohorts. Results A total of 480 participants completed the study (239 healthy, 241 anxiety and/or depression). While participants from the tw2o cohorts had significantly different PROMIS scores (p < .05), both cohorts welcomed the concept of a patient-centric dashboard, saw value in sharing results with their healthcare provider, and wanted to view results over time. However, factors needing consideration before widespread use included personalization for the patient and their health issues, integration with existing information (eg electronic health records), and integration into clinician workflow. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated a strong desire among healthy people, patients with chronic diseases, and healthcare providers for a self-assessment portal that can collect patient-reported outcome metrics and deliver personalized feedback.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference55 articles.

1. Secondary use of EHR: data quality issues and informatics opportunities;Botsis;AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc,2010

2. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care;Jensen;Nat Rev Genet,2012

3. Mining electronic health records;Ramakrishnan;Computer,2010

4. From computers to ubiquitous computing by 2010: health care;Aziz;Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci,2008

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3