Harmonizing and extending standards from a domain-specific and bottom-up approach: an example from development through use in clinical applications

Author:

Harris Marcelline R1,Langford Laura Heermann2,Miller Holly3,Hook Mary4,Dykes Patricia C5,Matney Susan A6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Systems Leadership and Effectiveness Science, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Homer Warner Center for Informatics Research, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

3. Terminology Division, Knowledge Based Systems, Veterans Health Administration Office of Informatics and Analytics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

4. Knowledge-Based Nursing Department, Aurora Health System, Milwaukee, WI, USA

5. Center for Nursing Excellence, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

6. 3M Health Information Systems, Murray, UT, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Currently, the processes for harmonizing and extending standards by leveraging the knowledge within local documentation artifacts are not well described. We describe a collaborative project to develop common information models, terminology bindings, and term definitions based on nursing documentation systems, and carry the findings through to the adoption in standards development organizations (SDOs) and technical implementations in clinical applications. Materials and Methods Nursing flowsheet documents from six large organizations were analyzed to generate a common information model and terminologies that fully expressed documentation across all systems, and were sufficient for evidence-based decision support, reporting, and analysis. Results Significant gaps in existing standards were identified. The models and terminologies were submitted to and incorporated by SDOs, are published, implemented, and now serving as a foundation for an eMeasure. Discussion There are few examples in the literature of success working through the standards development process from a bottom-up perspective. Subsequently, standards do not yet fully address the need for detailed clinical data that enables, for example, decision support as well as a range of reporting and analytic requirements. Recommendations from this project include transparent processes within SDOs, registries that make models and associated terminologies freely available, and coordinated governance processes. Conclusion We demonstrated the feasibility of using documentation artifacts in a bottom-up approach to develop common models and sets of terms that are complete from the perspective of clinical implementation. Importantly, we demonstrated a process by which a community of practice can contribute to closing gaps in existing standards using SDO processes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference18 articles.

1. Approaching semantic interoperability in Health Level Seven;Dolin;JAMIA.,2011

2. Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT;Goossen,2008

3. A semantic-web oriented representation of the clinical element model for secondary use of electronic health records data;Tao;JAMIA.,2013

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3