Developing machine learning-based models to help identify child abuse and neglect: key ethical challenges and recommended solutions

Author:

Landau Aviv Y1ORCID,Ferrarello Susi2,Blanchard Ashley3,Cato Kenrick4,Atkins Nia5,Salazar Stephanie6,Patton Desmond U6,Topaz Maxim7

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University Data Science Institute, Columbia University School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

2. Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies, California State University, Hayward, California, USA

3. New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

5. Columbia College, New York, New York, USA

6. Columbia School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

7. Columbia University Data Science Institute, Columbia School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Child abuse and neglect are public health issues impacting communities throughout the United States. The broad adoption of electronic health records (EHR) in health care supports the development of machine learning–based models to help identify child abuse and neglect. Employing EHR data for child abuse and neglect detection raises several critical ethical considerations. This article applied a phenomenological approach to discuss and provide recommendations for key ethical issues related to machine learning–based risk models development and evaluation: (1) biases in the data; (2) clinical documentation system design issues; (3) lack of centralized evidence base for child abuse and neglect; (4) lack of “gold standard “in assessment and diagnosis of child abuse and neglect; (5) challenges in evaluation of risk prediction performance; (6) challenges in testing predictive models in practice; and (7) challenges in presentation of machine learning–based prediction to clinicians and patients. We provide recommended solutions to each of the 7 ethical challenges and identify several areas for further policy and research.

Funder

Data Science Institute Seed Funds Program at Columbia University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3