Defining AMIA’s artificial intelligence principles

Author:

Solomonides Anthony E1ORCID,Koski Eileen2,Atabaki Shireen M3,Weinberg Scott4,McGreevey John D5,Kannry Joseph L6ORCID,Petersen Carolyn7ORCID,Lehmann Christoph U8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NorthShore University HealthSystem, Research Institute, Evanston, Illinois, USA

2. Center for Computational Health, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA

3. Pediatrics; Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine Children s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

4. Public Policy, American Medical Informatics Association, Rockville, Maryland, USA

5. Center for Applied Health Informatics and Office of the Chief Medical Information Officer, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

6. Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

7. Health Education & Content Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

8. Clinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in the science and technology of artificial intelligence (AI) and growing numbers of deployed AI systems in healthcare and other services have called attention to the need for ethical principles and governance. We define and provide a rationale for principles that should guide the commission, creation, implementation, maintenance, and retirement of AI systems as a foundation for governance throughout the lifecycle. Some principles are derived from the familiar requirements of practice and research in medicine and healthcare: beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice come first. A set of principles follow from the creation and engineering of AI systems: explainability of the technology in plain terms; interpretability, that is, plausible reasoning for decisions; fairness and absence of bias; dependability, including “safe failure”; provision of an audit trail for decisions; and active management of the knowledge base to remain up to date and sensitive to any changes in the environment. In organizational terms, the principles require benevolence—aiming to do good through the use of AI; transparency, ensuring that all assumptions and potential conflicts of interest are declared; and accountability, including active oversight of AI systems and management of any risks that may arise. Particular attention is drawn to the case of vulnerable populations, where extreme care must be exercised. Finally, the principles emphasize the need for user education at all levels of engagement with AI and for continuing research into AI and its biomedical and healthcare applications.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3