Pragmatic (trial) informatics: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory

Author:

Richesson Rachel L12,Green Beverly B3,Laws Reesa4,Puro Jon5,Kahn Michael G6,Bauck Alan4,Smerek Michelle7,Van Eaton Erik G8,Zozus Meredith9,Ed Hammond W2,Stephens Kari A10,Simon Greg E3

Affiliation:

1. Division of Clinical Systems and Analytics, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA

2. Duke Center for Health Informatics, Durham, NC, USA

3. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

4. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA

5. OCHIN Inc, Portland, OR, USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA

7. Clinical Research Informatics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA

8. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

9. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

10. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are research investigations embedded in health care settings designed to increase the efficiency of research and its relevance to clinical practice. The Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory, initiated by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund in 2010, is a pioneering cooperative aimed at identifying and overcoming operational challenges to pragmatic research. Drawing from our experience, we present 4 broad categories of informatics-related challenges: (1) using clinical data for research, (2) integrating data from heterogeneous systems, (3) using electronic health records to support intervention delivery or health system change, and (4) assessing and improving data capture to define study populations and outcomes. These challenges impact the validity, reliability, and integrity of PCTs. Achieving the full potential of PCTs and a learning health system will require meaningful partnerships between health system leadership and operations, and federally driven standards and policies to ensure that future electronic health record systems have the flexibility to support research.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3