Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere?

Author:

Tieu Lina1,Schillinger Dean1,Sarkar Urmimala1,Hoskote Mekhala2,Hahn Kenneth J2,Ratanawongsa Neda1,Ralston James D3,Lyles Courtney R1

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Francisco, Center for Vulnerable Populations

2. College of Letters and Science, University of California, Berkeley,

3. Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Objective: With the rapid rise in the adoption of patient portals, many patients are gaining access to their personal health information online for the first time. The objective of this study was to examine specific usability barriers to patient portal engagement among a diverse group of patients and caregivers. Materials and Methods: We conducted interviews using performance testing and think-aloud methods with 23 patients and 2 caregivers as they first attempted to use features of a newly launched patient portal. Results: In navigating the portal, participants experienced basic computer barriers (eg, difficulty using a mouse), routine computer barriers (eg, mistyping, navigation issues), reading/writing barriers, and medical content barriers. Compared to participants with adequate health literacy, participants with limited health literacy required 2 additional minutes to complete each task and were more likely to experience each type of navigational barrier. They also experienced more inaccuracies in interpreting a test result and finding a treatment plan within an after-visit summary. Discussion: When using a patient portal for the first time, participants with limited health literacy completed fewer tasks unassisted, had a higher prevalence of encountering barriers, took longer to complete tasks, and had more problems accurately interpreting medical information. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a strong need for tailored and accessible training and support to assist all vulnerable patients and/or caregivers with portal registration and use. Measuring the health literacy of a patient population might serve as a strong proxy for identifying patients who need the most support in using health technologies.

Funder

Healthcare Research and Quality

the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Library of Medicine

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference53 articles.

1. National-scale clinical information exchange in the United Kingdom: lessons for the United States;Payne;J Am Med Inform Assoc.,2011

2. The use of health information technology in seven nations;Jha;Int J Med Inform.,2008

3. A comparison of English and French approaches to providing patients access to Summary Care Records: scope, consent, cost;de Lusignan;Stud Health Technol Inform.,2013

4. Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care;Mold;Br J Gen Pract.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3