Interactive use of online health resources: a comparison of consumer and professional questions

Author:

Roberts Kirk1,Demner-Fushman Dina1

Affiliation:

1. Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38A/1003H Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To understand how consumer questions on online resources differ from questions asked by professionals, and how such consumer questions differ across resources. Materials and Methods Ten online question corpora, 5 consumer and 5 professional, with a combined total of over 40 000 questions, were analyzed using a variety of natural language processing techniques. These techniques analyze questions at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels, exposing differences in both form and content. Results Consumer questions tend to be longer than professional questions, more closely resemble open-domain language, and focus far more on medical problems. Consumers ask more sub-questions, provide far more background information, and ask different types of questions than professionals. Furthermore, there is substantial variance of these factors between the different consumer corpora. Discussion The form of consumer questions is highly dependent upon the individual online resource, especially in the amount of background information provided. Professionals, on the other hand, provide very little background information and often ask much shorter questions. The content of consumer questions is also highly dependent upon the resource. While professional questions commonly discuss treatments and tests, consumer questions focus disproportionately on symptoms and diseases. Further, consumers place far more emphasis on certain types of health problems (eg, sexual health). Conclusion Websites for consumers to submit health questions are a popular online resource filling important gaps in consumer health information. By analyzing how consumers write questions on these resources, we can better understand these gaps and create solutions for improving information access. This article is part of the Special Focus on Person-Generated Health and Wellness Data, which published in the May 2016 issue, Volume 23, Issue 3.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Enhancing Large Language Models’ Utility for Medical Question-Answering: A Patient Health Question Summarization Approach;2023 14th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA);2023-11-22

2. A conversational agent system for dietary supplements use;BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making;2022-07

3. Biomedical Question Answering: A Survey of Approaches and Challenges;ACM Computing Surveys;2022-01-18

4. Natural Language Processing;Cognitive Informatics in Biomedicine and Healthcare;2022

5. A study of similar question retrieval method in online health communities;International Journal of Crowd Science;2021-06-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3